Sunday, February 27, 2005

nice 301 redirect with mapping

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Just came across this problem, and this is a nice one for search marketers. How to move an old site to a new one, while mapping old pages to new ones with as less hassle as possible.

1) create a correspondance table in excel, 1 column for old urls, 1 column for new ones, following this modele:

/page1.html http://www.yournewssite/pagex.html
/page2.html http://www.yournewssite/pagey.html
etc ...

=> then export it as tab delimited text file, save it as redirect.txt, and upload it onto your server, at the html root.

2) create redirect.php which looks like this:
$file = "http://www.youroldsite.com/redirect.txt";
$default = "http://www.yournewsite.com";

$url = $_GET["url"];
$lines = file($file);

foreach ($lines as $line){
$array = explode (chr(9), $line);
$start = $array[0];
$landing = $array[1];
if ($start == $url){
header("HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently");
header("Location: $landing");
exit();
}
}
header("HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently");
header("Location: $default");
?>

3) add this url rewriting directives to your .htaccess file:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.*).html$ /redirect.php?url=/$1.html [L]
RewriteRule ^$ /redirect.php [L]

That's it, once you have uploaded the .htaccess, the redirect is then carried over smoothly, without changing anything to your html files.

Free ads for your blog

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

The free ads networks are more & more used. I quite like this one:

Promote your blog for free.

You just sign in, and you start creating & managing your ads. I really like their clean & neat type of management.

Cheeky from Yahoo

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Find it quite cheeky to ask webmaster to display this add-on for free on their site, while google pays them through adsense to display their search search form...

Results are not too bad, a bit distracting but not too bad. Would definitely use this on affiliation sites if yahoo could make a little efforts and pay me for the traffic I am sending to them.

At least, you should be able to select between natural or paid listing results.

Suggestion I have sent: would be nice to be able to choose between natural or paid listing results (available for publishers: you then stick your publisher id in). If you decide to show paid listing results, you get paid for the traffic you send them.
Fair enough isn't it?

Embedding Y!Q

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -


Jazar is the best CMS (content management system) ever developed. Let's see what yahoo finds for this theme ....









Friday, February 25, 2005

Top 20 search engines in the UK( Neilsen//Netratings )

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Number of click throughs per searcher shown in brackets.
Rank by number of unique searchers shown on the right.

1. Google (17.9) 1
2. Yahoo! (14.5) 2
3. AltaVista (13.6) 15
4. Tiscali (7.8) 12
5. My Way (6.0) 6
6. MSN (5.5) 4
7. Wanadoo (5.5) 10
8. Lycos (4.8) 16
9. Ask Jeeves (4.5) 3
10. Dogpile.com (2.7) 18
11. AOL (2.3) 7
12. Lycos Europe (2.0) 13
13. YELL.com (1.6) 13 9
14. Search the Web! (1.5) 19
15. DealTime (1.2) 11
16. Kelkoo (1.1) 5
17. NexTag (1.0) 8
18. WebFetch (0.5) 14
19. Shopping.com (0.5) 20
20. Info.com (0.4) 17


Let's make sense out of these figures now:

If I have to pay for each visitor coming to my site, I want a visitor who doesn't spend his time browsing my competitors: basically, if a visitor is "worth" let's say £100 of purchase, and visit 10 shops, the absolute value of each visit is worth £10.

Now if the same searcher visits only 2 shops, his "absolute" value is now £50 for each visit.

To demonstrate that, let's take a very small population of competitors: shop 1 (my shop), shop 2, shop 3. Let's run the test in two environments : search engine 1 ( 3 clicks through in average), and search engine 2 ( 1 click through in average). let's finally say that 9 searchers querying both search engine 1 and search engine 2.

In the first one, statistically, my visitor has visited my shop (shop 1), but shop 2 & shop 3 as well. On the other end, I get the 9 searchers to visit my shop.

In the second one, my visitor has not visited other shops than mine. On the other end, I only get 3 searchers out of 9 who will visit my shop.

Now do you prefer 3 visits from searchers who will not visit any other competitors, or 9 searcher who compare your products with all your other competitors.. You don't have to choose. The point here is that both search engines are worth consideration.

Does your website comply with uk law?

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

If you advertise or sell goods and services online there are minimum legal requirements you need to meet (UK’s E-Commerce Regulations 2002):

What are the E-Commerce Regulations 2002?
The Electronic Commerce (EC) Regulations 2002 were designed to improve e-commerce and increase consumer confidence by making clear the rights and obligations of businesses and consumers.

While the regulations were not designed specifically as a consumer protection measure, a sanction called the ‘Stop Now’ Order was introduced after the original regulations came into force. It allows the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Trading Standards Service to take enforcement action against certain
breaches.

How to comply

The requirements contained in the regulations can be divided into three categories: information, commercial communications and electronic contracting requirements.

Information requirements
If you advertise or sell goods or services online you must provide customers with the following information:
• full contact details including geographic address, corporate identity, contact details and the name of
your company
• details of any trade bodies you are a member of
• details of any relevant online business authorisation schemes and their VAT registration number
• your VAT number, if your online activities are subject to VAT
• a clear indication of pricing and whether prices include tax and/or delivery charges

Commercial requirements
If you promote your goods or services via e-mail you must ensure that:
• it is clear that you are communicating in order to promote or advertise a product or service
• you clearly identify what business the e-mail has been sent by, or on behalf of (if you are promoting the goods and services of another company)
• you clearly identify any promotions you have on offer
• you explain who qualifies for any promotional offers
• unsolicited emails can be easily identified without having to open them, e.g. you put “unsolicited” or something similar in the subject line

Contracting online
If your customers can place orders online make sure you:
• provide a description of the steps to go through to complete a contract online
• make it clear at what point in the process customers have committed themselves
• explain if the contract will be filed and if it can be accessed
• show how to correct any inputting mistakes
• list which languages are on offer to complete the contract
• always give receipt of orders made (as soon as possible)
• allow users to view, store and print your terms and conditions

What happens if you don’t comply?
Non-compliance with the E-Commerce Regulations can have serious consequences for a business. Depending on the non-compliance, customers or end-users may:
• cancel their order
• get a court order against you
• sue you for damages for breach of statutory duty (if they can demonstrate that they have suffered a
loss as a result of your failure to comply)

Given certain breaches of the regulations, the OFT and Trading Standards Departments can apply to the courts for a Stop Now Order (under the Enterprise Act 2002) if your failure to comply “harms the collective interest of consumers”.

Limited liability for service providers
The regulations limit the liability of service providers (businesses that provide a service online) that unwittingly carry or store unlawful content supplied by others, providing:
• they are just a host of the information
• they had no prior knowledge of the unlawful content
• they remove the content as soon as it is shown to be unlawful

This limited liability is intended to promote self-regulation amongst service providers. For example, if you provide a directory of information on various companies it is advisable to first check out the credentials of
those companies. But, if it transpired that a company had lied about its credentials you would not be held liable. You would however have to remove the false information immediately.

Whose law applies to cross-border trade?
Generally, businesses will be required to comply by the law of the country in which they are based. So, those established in the UK - regardless of where their customers are based - will be subject to UK national law. But in cross-border cases where the businesses are based in another country - but sell to
UK consumers - the OFT will encourage overseas authorities to take action using their own domestic laws.

How do the E-Commerce Regulations and Distance Selling Regulations differ?
While there are some crossovers between the two - such as the type of information to be provided by businesses - the main differences are in the nature of the transactions they could apply to and the nature of the information required. Put simply, the E-Commerce Regulations could apply in situations where the
Distance Selling Regulations would not.


For more information on the Distance Selling Regulations, visit:
http://www.dti.gov.uk/ccp/topics1/guide/distsell.htm





Summary



Ensure your business complies with all the requirements of the E-Commerce Regulations. This may
mean that you may need to make some textual or structural changes to the medium you use to advertise
or promote your product or service online. By complying you are protecting your business from potentially
damaging consequences.

domain names for sale on ebay

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

www.WhatIsMyIp.com has been sold for $386000 (starting price $3,500)on ebay!

My bet is that domain names sales are going to be more & more trendy this year. Not for the domain name itself (branding purpose) such as www.bestdeal.com, etc ... but for SEO again.

Google in particular penalises new sites. No way nowaday to get a consistant good ranking soon in competitive areas. "SandBox" filter seems to be the ultimate weapon to prevent flash spam sites to take over the SERP in a few days or weeks.

But what about if you buy a good old site, which has been around for years ... you have found the work around to escape the SandBox Filter.

This is why people can invest these kind of money in domain names: the guaranty of escaping google filters is worth a few pennies, quite esay actually to evaluate if you take the average 6 months you save in traffic by escaping the sandbox).

Thursday, February 24, 2005

Pingomatic

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Just found out about this useful tools for "Blogs Maniac": Pingomatic.com.

you then make sure that spiders will crawl your blog quick once it is released.

Press release - first results

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

First results: how many sites have been indexed within 24 hours, with the content of the article:

See results in google here

Not too bad. 1 PageRank 5.

monitoring your site for free

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

You want to make sure that your hosting company 99.99% up time included in their tos is respected. Have a look at http://www.internetseer.com

they offer a free monitoring service (ping every hour, which is acceptable for sites hosted on shared servers). If your expectations are higher than that, you should go for a dedicated server.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

back from china

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Just back from China, where we set up an office. On my way back, good news, PRweb releases our first article:
about our translation module.

Let's track the results now.

Thursday, February 17, 2005

Ebusiness convention in France - Lyon

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Just come back from the ebusiness event in Lyon (France). It was quite interesting. I must say that I was a bit disappointed by the number of people attending this event ... my speach was at the end of the afternoon.

Subjet: Content Management Systems: 100% focus on Marketing.

Well, only 20 persons attended! And when I asked at the beginning of the show who was actually familiar with the concept of content management, nobody raised his hand. When I then asked who was involved in e-commerce, only 3 hands raised ... I still wonder who were the other guys ... I am not going to ask for the list - I can bet they were actually paid by the organisers!

Well, the return was not too bad, and 2 out of the 3 persons who raised their hand came up to me after the show. And even if Lyon is not priority 1 on our list of prospect, there seems to be already a market for us today, and we will give it a try.

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

Ask Jeeves and blogline

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

askJeeves as just acquired BlogLine. I thought, hey, best opportunity to have a look at what it is and what they offer.

Pretty sleak design, easy to register, and even easier to start your blog (I find it even easier than blogger to be honest).

Here we go: galide on blogline. doesn't mean anything to you.

Doesn't matter, it is a public experiment, based on some read from searchenginewatch. will try to optimise a galide page for content management system (I'll just have to edit one the existing page on this blog). But first, let's build some semantic connections here and there, as it is suggested on an interesting thread from SEW (Let's see if it works).

One of the poster has suggested an interesting drill to optimise pages following "semantic rules":
1) I search the top 50 SERPs for the word "poster frames"
2) I document 7 words to the left and 7 words to the right of each occurence of "poster frames" in all 50 pages.
3) I statistically look for patterns/frequency of these contiguous words excluding the words "poster" and "frames" and stop words
4) I come up with new semantically related words like "prints", "movie", "design", "furniture", "display", "posters" that repeat frequently
5) cross reference these words against synonyms in WordNet
6) cross reference againast clustering search engines (i.e vivisimo, iclusty) for key phrase "poster frames"
7) look for "chunker" patterns (i.e- prepositional phrases)
8) write good relevant text/copy incorporating these related words and chunking patterns

1 day before going on holiday, I feel too lazy to set up a benchmark to test this. So.. it was just to illustrate what optimisation will start looking like if it turns out that it works. I will bet on it, the idea sounds quite attractive, and I have used already all the time I usually dedicate to SEO ... No more thoughts about it, let's get hands dirty, and track if any good results show up.

google adsense new features

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Just filled a new survey from adsense. Looks like some new interesting features are coming up:
- be able to manage multiple accounts for clients.
- enabling advertisers to bid directly for placement on your site(s)

They list other advertising programs
- Quigo AdSonar Aware
- Overture Content Match
- Kanoodle Context Target
- Industry Brains
- BidClix
- FindWhat
- Vibrant Media
- AdBrite
- BlogAds

Neither Mirago nor Espotting are in the lot ... mmmh, I guess the survey is not targetted uk.


A Search Engine which rocks

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Have a look at the new "guru2 website: http://www.answers.com/content%20management%20systems

Just cannot say how much I like it. Provide the answers your are looking for directly, without hassle.

While I'll keep google for all the tutorials, and programming references, I'll definitely move to this one when I am looking for definitions or info in general.

Sunday, February 06, 2005

elasticity

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Pfffu, Jazar has been quicked out again by google. Why. Because of linking campaigns too heavy (this is my guess anyway).

I have listed the site in 15 new directories. This listing has been taken into account from yesterday. We were on page 3 for "jazar", bing #2 on page 1 instantly. But then, disappeared again today! well, doesn't matter really.. if you look for "jazar" in google, you'll find us. Why? Because I leave clues everywhere about how to find us. You just have to accept that it takes time to build popularity, and consistency is THE rule to follow.

Even if google carries on quicking us out, I'll carry on adding more inbound links, until inbound links start building by themselves :-). And it will pay off, as it has paid off in the past, and as it will always pay off. This is like an elastic - adding more inbound links to your site gives more "elasticity to your site", and even if you can be quicked out for a short while, you increase you chance in the long run to survive big updates.

Keep consistent, and you will win at the end. That's my philosophy anyway.

Saturday, February 05, 2005

m1nt

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

http://www.dividendslondon.co.uk/

Nice concept.

Your membership gives you access to shares. Exclusive place, it looks like a good idea to join if you are into jetset life style.

Still waiting for a nice invitation from them though.

Friday, February 04, 2005

semantic and Search Engines

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Google and other search engines try to make the best of your queries, trying to figure out what are the best results they can offer.

Thanks to the pagerank factor (or equivalent for other search engines), they get votes from other websites to help them decide whether a page is or is not related to your query.

But they need to take synonyms into account. This is where semantic comes in.

add "~" at the beginning of the word, and you will get an other set of results, based on semantic search. You get Nokia for phones, BMW for cars, etc ...

How does it work? You may think...probably co-occurence is taken into account - but if it is, it is definitely weighted somehow:

co-occurence: take the number of results for kw1 (n1), number of results for kw2 (n2), and then number of results for kw1+kw2 (n12)

=> c-index (correlation index) = c = n12/(n1 + n2 - n12)
mortgage is related to microsoft for instance (type ~mortgage in google). but c-index is very low for the two keywords.

In some case, you have got more results for the keyword itself than for the combination ~keyword. It means that the algorithm is not taking into account all the parameters it usally does. it keeps some off page factors though, because some pages are displayed without related keywords on them (easy to test). which parameters are taken out ... worth finding out.

How can google associate "microsoft" with "mortgage", or "phone" with "nokia"? The pageRank seems to be involved (all the site coming first have a very decent PR, big brands steal the top spots). there is definetely something to look into on this side.



It is not a reciprocal meaning:
~phone leads to nokia
~nokia doesn't lead to phone.

I leave the problem open. How does google builds its own thesaurus? any manual input?











Thursday, February 03, 2005

interested in SEM

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Hard to keep up these days. Here is a good list of public resources to start with.
http://www.seroundtable.com/resources.html

back to the top

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

aaah, back to top rank results for both galide & jazar. Both in the same time. strange isn't it?

Tuesday, February 01, 2005

french SEO

Add to Delicious Digg this links to this post -

Well done brothers:

http://www.webrankinfo.com/
http://www.Zorgloob.com

We start posting in french... ah c'est bon!